Chartthaipattana Party Advocates for Amnesty Bill Excluding Monarchy-Related Sections.

Bangkok: Chartthaipattana Party (CTP) has declared its support for the Amnesty Bill, provided that Sections 110 and 112 are excluded. Mr. Nikorn Chamnong, Chairman of the Strategy Committee of CTP, emphasized that the party believes in overcoming conflicts and has urged political parties to propose a draft law aimed at reconciliation. According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Nikorn expressed his views on the Amnesty Act, acknowledging that multiple versions have been submitted to parliament. These versions include offenses related to the King and the heir to the throne under Sections 110 and 112. He reiterated the party's commitment to supporting every draft while striving for reconciliation-a stance consistent since Mr. Banharn Silpa-archa's leadership, as CTP has actively engaged with various parties and groups to foster unity. Mr. Nikorn further stated that during the campaign, CTP promoted the idea of 'transcending conflicts and joining forces to reform the country.' However, he clarified that the party would not support including monarchy-related offenses in the bill, as it could exacerbate conflicts instead of resolving them. Reflecting on his experience as a former secretary of the Amnesty Bill Study Committee, Mr. Nikorn described the issue as delicate. He noted that the current study report of the bill draft faces challenges in passing through the House. If it were to become a draft law, passing it would be even more difficult. Mr. Nikorn highlighted the presence of four pending laws in parliament, which must be addressed when the session resumes. He acknowledged the intention of government leaders, like the Pheu Thai Party, to introduce another draft, applauding their decision to exclude Sections 110 and 112. He stressed the importance of having clear principles and offenses attached to the amnesty bill, confirming that CTP will support such a draft. Addressing concerns about differing opinions among political parties, Mr. Nikorn asserted that the method of consideration should focus on drafts excluding S ections 110 and 112. He called for a unified consensus, encouraging political parties to contribute to the creation of a comprehensive list of offenses. He regarded this as a positive step towards resolving Thailand's long-standing conflicts. When questioned about the perception that the amnesty bill might aid individuals in escaping punishment, Mr. Nikorn refuted the notion, clarifying that the bill is not intended for personal benefit. He advocated for separating the drafts and voting on them individually due to their differing contents. Ultimately, he expressed confidence that the draft from the core Pheu Thai Party would serve as the main draft and pass without issues.