Bangkok: Lawyer Chanin has issued a warning to a group of lawyers who are preparing to submit a petition to the King regarding the Khao Kradong case. He cautioned that addressing a dispute still under judicial consideration could encroach on the court's authority and violate the rule of law. This action, he emphasized, must not become a loophole for interfering with the judicial process, as it may raise public suspicions.
According to Thai News Agency, the case involves Mr. Panyawan Panyasith and Mr. Boonthaworn Panyamaneechot, notable lawyers who announced on Facebook their intention to submit a petition to reclaim the "Khao Kradong" land in Buriram province and file charges against the Director-General of the Department of Land and others on June 10, 2026. Mr. Chanin Kaenhirun, the lawyer responsible for the Khao Kradong case, expressed on Facebook that while submitting a petition is a legal right, it should be exercised with honesty and care, especially by legal professionals who possess a deeper understanding of the justice system.
The petition in question suggests that the Khao Kradong land dispute has been resolved, claiming that the land belongs to the State Railway of Thailand without further contention. However, significant cases are still pending in court, including an administrative case between the State Railway of Thailand and the Department of Land, and a civil case involving several land title holders. Final judgments on the rights of the parties involved have yet to be issued by the courts.
Additionally, the petition omits the fact that the title deeds and related ownership documents have not been legally revoked, leaving title holders legally protected. The Land Department continues to maintain its legal stance in the ongoing court proceedings. This omission could mislead the recipient into believing the dispute has been resolved, whereas the facts are still under judicial review.
The general guidelines for petitions to the monarch are not meant to interfere with the judicial process. Presenting unresolved disputes in a way that suggests a predetermined outcome raises questions about appropriateness and adherence to the rule of law.
Legal professionals are reminded that justice requires the court to adjudicate based on complete evidence from all parties, rather than presenting a one-sided narrative that could lead the public or recipients to think the case has been decided when it remains under consideration.
Regardless of the eventual outcome of the Khao Kradong case, it is vital that legal professionals respect due process, present all facts, and refrain from prejudging individuals' rights before a final judgment is rendered.