Bangkok: Anutin Charnvirakul, Prime Minister and Minister of Interior, has firmly stated that his actions in dissolving parliament were in line with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and did not betray any political partners. He emphasized that while he adhered to the MOA, he could not compel the Senate to vote on constitutional amendments, a matter not covered by the agreement.
According to Thai News Agency, Anutin explained that the decision to dissolve parliament was influenced by a request from the People's Party, who expressed their lack of support despite having previously voted for him as Prime Minister. He highlighted that the dissolution was a response to their request and aligned with appropriate procedures.
Anutin further clarified that the Bhumjaithai Party, which he leads, had consistently worked towards constitutional amendments, fulfilling all points agreed in the MOA. However, discussions around amending Article 256/28, related to the Senate's power, were not part of the agreement. He pointed out that the People's Party's demand for parliament dissolution came after they threatened not to support the government if the Senate did not align with their expectations.
In response to inquiries about negotiations with the People's Party, Anutin mentioned ongoing discussions, coordinated by Mr. Paradorn Prisnanantakul from the Prime Minister's Office. He also addressed speculations about a no-confidence motion, stating that the decision to dissolve parliament was made to show respect to the People's Party, who had initially supported the government formation.
Anutin reiterated that the Bhumjaithai Party's stance on the Senate's voting power did not equate to political betrayal, as there were no provisions regarding the Senate in the MOA. He affirmed the party's commitment to constitutional amendments and emphasized that they had refrained from seeking an increase in MPs or majority control.
When asked about future collaborations with the People's Party, Anutin remained open to possibilities. He also addressed questions on whether the dissolution was pre-planned, noting that preparations for such a decree began at the start of his tenure. Anutin emphasized the government's role in addressing national issues, gaining international recognition, and maintaining civil service continuity, asserting that returning power to the people was the right course of action when support dwindled.