Bangkok, “Sirikanya” denies impairment and credit. “Digital Wallet” understands that the government is having trouble finding a source of money. Suggest to change to something else instead. I believe the people can accept it. Look at the coalition government supporting digital wallets. Waiting to show his attitude through the Cabinet resolution.
Ms. Sirikanya Tansakul, Deputy Leader of the Progressive Party Denies accusations that the Kaewklai Party discredits the digital wallet policy. Just reiterating the intention of wanting the government to inform the people of factual information. But the government views it as an impairment and discredits it. It must apologize, even though the government did not do as campaigned for. It is not to the point of breaking political law. Or is there something wrong? If it is going to violate the constitution It is seen that when the government moves forward with the policy of issuing emergency decrees on loans Or if you want to use a state bank, you still face problems with related laws. At the same time, although the government distributes payments in installments Using a 4-year commitment budget is still against currency laws.
Ms. Sirikanya believes that if the full committee listens to the reflections and objections from society Assess that there may be a change in strategy. that may not use the criteria as the subcommittee has proposed to consider the 3 conditions or may have proposed a new one, waiting for clarity and understanding that the government is having a headache in finding budget sources to use with this project Because the normal budget is not enough. Personally, I see that There are many other ways to put the budget to good use and value. Because the budget is limited and cannot be increased in the short term To be used in the digital wallet policy Therefore, it is proposed that the government change the budget to use in other projects. that will affect the economy in a better direction, such as investment
Ms. Sirikanya believes that in the end, the Cabinet will have to vote on whether to proceed with this policy or not. And we will see the attitude of the coalition parties whether they agree with this policy or not. But personally I see that When the coalition party Have joined the same hall. should be seen in the same direction This will not be an obstacle for the coalition government to prevent this project from happening. But it is still not clearly indicated that the party has advanced as an opposition party. The policy will be brought to the general discussion. Or is it a no-confidence debate? Because at this time the policy is still unclear. Because it hasn’t started yet Therefore there is still not enough information. But once the project has started, we will see what problems there are. And the Progressive Party will follow the details closely. along with recommendations to the government that The goal should be more important than the method.
“If you hold on to the fact that you have to give money away. Just give out money It may cause the loss of the big goal that the Pheu Thai Party has promised the people to grow the economy to 5% GDP over 4 years if the methods are changed and the same results are achieved. I believe the people will be able to listen,” Ms. Sirikanya said. – Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency