Petition Filed to Dissolve People’s Party Over Alleged Profit-Seeking Scheme

Bangkok: A petition has been submitted to the Election Commission by Mr. Thanakwin Ratwattakangkun, an independent academic, urging the commission to expedite the referral of a case to the Constitutional Court for the dissolution of the People's Party. The petition claims evidence against Ms. Pannika Wanich and seeks the revocation of election rights for 14 party executives due to their alleged involvement in "Spectre C," which is described as a profit-seeking scheme.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Thanakwin's petition highlights three primary concerns. The first issue calls for the dissolution of the People's Party due to its alleged connections with "Specifier C," a company linked to individuals outside the political party. The petition includes evidence of Ms. Pannika's involvement and claims that the People's Party rented an entire building where both the party office and the company are located.

Mr. Thanakwin provided details indicating that the People's Party rents the building for 200,000 baht monthly and that Ms. Pannika's interview revealed control over the building's facilities. He argues that the presence of "Solbar," an alcohol-selling business, and "SpecterC," a media production company, within the building suggests profit-seeking activities, violating political party principles.

Further allegations were made regarding the use of party funds or taxpayer money to support these activities, potentially constituting an illegal act under political party law. Additionally, the petition questions Ms. Pannika's continued involvement in party activities despite her revoked political rights, suggesting potential unauthorized influence over the party.

The third concern involves 14 party executives, including prime ministerial candidates, who are allegedly linked to SpecterC. Mr. Thanakwin argues that their business interests may disqualify them from candidacy and demands an investigation into their eligibility to run for election.

In response to inquiries about additional evidence, Mr. Thanakwin stated that various forms of documentation, including news photos, videos, and related interviews, have been submitted for investigation. He emphasized that the action is a legal exercise, not 'legal warfare,' and urged all parties to adhere to legal standards.