Bangkok: The opposition parties have set their sights on Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul and Minister of Digital Economy and Society Chaiyanok Chidchob as they prepare for a no-confidence debate. Parit Wacharasindhu, a list MP from the People's Party, disclosed that discussions have commenced with coalition partners, with Rangsiman Rome slated to lead the effort. The exact timing of the Prime Minister's potential removal remains unspecified.
According to Thai News Agency, the opposition, including the newly joined Thai Ruam Palang Party, has agreed to pursue a no-confidence motion under Article 151 of the Constitution, which involves a general debate followed by a vote. The opposition is moving swiftly, with plans to form a working group to gather signatures and draft the motion. This effort is expected to conclude within a few weeks.
Parit Wacharasindhu refrained from predicting the presence of decisive evidence that could destabilize the government but expressed confidence in the opposition's preparations. He noted the Prime Minister's readiness to address all questions and expressed hope that the Bhumjaithai Party would not seek procedural loopholes to evade discussions on sensitive issues such as Senate collusion and local government exam irregularities.
When asked about the potential for the People's Party to unseat Prime Minister Anutin, Parit emphasized the opposition's commitment to scrutinizing the government. He highlighted the importance of presenting evidence to the public and fostering an environment where the electorate might favor a different party in future elections, thereby facilitating a government change through popular vote.
Regarding the timing of the no-confidence debate and its potential outcomes, Parit stated that while the goal is to secure a majority no-confidence vote, the focus remains on shedding light on government issues. He acknowledged the unpredictability of securing government MPs' support but stressed that successful exposure of governmental problems during the debate could influence public opinion and increase the likelihood of governmental change in subsequent elections.