“Dr. Warong” gave testimony to the Election Commission on 3 issues.

Dr. Warong" gave testimony to the EC on 3 more issues to take action against "Thaksin" for dominating Pheu Thai, insisted that he did not submit a request to dissolve the coalition party. Dr. Warong Dechgitvigrom, advisor to the Thai Phakdee Party, gave a statement to the Election Commission regarding the petition to dissolve the Pheu Thai Party and allow Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra to take control and lead the party. Dr. Warong said that today the Election Commission invited him to give additional statements on 3 issues that were raised, including the meeting to form a government at Ban Chan Sung La on August 14, 2024, Mr. Thaksin's suggestion that Ms. Paethongtarn Shinawatra would hold a ministerial position, and the invitation of 6 coalition parties to discuss forming a government. And I will provide additional information to the EC on 3 more issues, but the party's legal advisory team believes that they should not be disclosed to the public because disclosure will cause the other party to distort the informa tion. These 3 new issues are important information and have credible reasons, which we have prepared documents to submit to the EC. We believe that the evidence we have and what the media reported, no Pheu Thai Party member has come out to deny the media's reporting. If the report is incorrect, someone from the Pheu Thai Party must come out to deny it. Therefore, we are confident that this piece of evidence will be able to prosecute the Pheu Thai Party and Mr. Thaksin. When asked if the Pheu Thai Party claimed that Thaksin did not dominate because the meeting at the Chan Song La house proposed Chaikasem Nitisiri, but in the end, the 6 coalition parties voted for Paethongtarn to be the prime minister, Dr. Warong said that the Pheu Thai Party disputed many points, but if there was no meeting to form a government that day, why did the Pheu Thai Party not come out to respond since that day? Why did it only come out to defend itself after the EC accepted the petition that it was a dinner? Even though on the day o f the meeting at the Chan Song La house, there was a resolution to nominate Chaikasem, but the next day, they voted for Paethongtarn to be the prime minister, we have to ask back that on the evening that Thaksin came to the meeting, if the coalition parties did not believe that Thaksin had power over Pheu Thai, why did the 6 coalition parties come to the meeting? They probably did not come to sit around and do nothing because the media reported the same thing. This shows that what Thaksin will do is to confirm that he has power over Pheu Thai, so all 6 coalition parties came to the meeting. And if Thaksin really does not have power over Pheu Thai, why did the people of Pheu Thai Party not come out to deny Thaksin? Interfering in the formation of the government at that time Dr. Warong added that his petition did not include accusations against the coalition parties, but there may be other petitioners. The reason he did not file a petition against the six coalition parties was because, as a political party own er, he did not believe that Thaksin would be able to dominate other political parties. However, he had the right to negotiate with the six parties, which reiterated that if the six coalition parties negotiated with Thaksin, it would be over, and it meant that Thaksin had power over the Pheu Thai Party. He thought that the Pheu Thai Party probably thought that what they had done had created a backlash against the Pheu Thai Party and Thaksin that was more severe than they thought. Of course, they would have to change their strategy, but the games that had flowed down were many, causing them to stop and assess the situation. At the very least, they would have to come and explain to the EC, and they would have to guess what the three additional issues that they had submitted to the EC were. He thought that they should not disclose them because once they did, they would create a situation that would cause people to misunderstand. Therefore, today, they were silent, they had to be defensive, and they could not adva nce any further. When asked if the Pheu Thai Party trusts the legal team to clarify this matter, Dr. Warong said that everything is factual. No matter how good the legal team is, if you do something wrong, it is difficult to fight. From what I have observed, the legal team always announces that it is nonsense, but in the end, there is a point. The legal team gives encouragement first. Let me tell you that this issue is not easy for the legal team. This does not include the issue that Mr. Thirayuth Suwannakasorn filed a complaint on the 14th floor. These are things that Mr. Thaksin and Pheu Thai Party agreed to do together, making the situation of the counterattack stronger than expected. I would like to tell the Pheu Thai Party that today compared to 20 years ago, society is not the same. There are many channels of communication. In the past, you could do anything with the media, but today everything is through social media, making the counterattack stronger than they expected, and they are in a difficult si tuation. "Although Thaksin has not come out today, I believe that he still controls and has influence over the government. There are many pieces of evidence in the past. I have warned Thaksin not to come out, but in the end, he created the evidence himself. Today, staying still is good. It will give the government time to solve the problem," said Dr. Warong. 314.-Thai News Agency Source: Thai News Agency